Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 05:18:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Did you ever read CNoted study at all? https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/7/1343 Proposed CN is factually both incorrect and argumentative - authors _addressed_ comorbidities (see tab 3), and studi is a new finding, so argumenting with older studies did _not_ falsify it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807956029763907786
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1719897500150
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807956029763907786DD2AED8BEA920887A05750C5442690091EFBD1D5A61560EC922F50D62E563DF6