Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 02:16:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
Participant Details

Original Note:

What he is saying in the post is extremism, not how the court ruled or what the docket states. The POTUS has immunity from a Presidential act. To state otherwise is inciteful and misleading. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807941400308469886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719886608389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1807941400308469886F4546B31C15BEFE5A94F3A43C041F877CCE1F7F03D1A0F2902E1EBE8178150EB