Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 08:35:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E43F206A0867809BA85B08960046743F63B380217489CA24456FBC647A92CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

There has also been a case made with an opposing viewpoint https://www.ft.com/content/c1326aa2-63bd-4f87-907d-a3eddfc4a5cc

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807912729149100248
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E43F206A0867809BA85B08960046743F63B380217489CA24456FBC647A92CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719909317378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180791272914910024804E43F206A0867809BA85B08960046743F63B380217489CA24456FBC647A92CB