Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 10:59:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B7EEC7C698BECC970B0C2E29FE844799CC6413CAC0171753B29237E684C7404
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS did not say "FU" in any context, but simply ruled on a politcally-charged case that does not align with this actor's far-left ideologies. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-due-rule-trumps-immunity-bid-blockbuster-case-2024-07-01/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/01/trump-immunity-supreme-court-ruling/ https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-immunity-supreme-court-decision-07-01-24/index.html SCOTUS ruling PDF: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf "...And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts...."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807911492894835126
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B7EEC7C698BECC970B0C2E29FE844799CC6413CAC0171753B29237E684C7404
  • createdAtMillis - 1719917986392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18079114928948351262B7EEC7C698BECC970B0C2E29FE844799CC6413CAC0171753B29237E684C7404