Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 01:03:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Supreme Court justice nominee during hearings have stated they wouldn't overturn Roe. It would have been improper as a nominee to pre-judge a case. https://www.senate.gov/committees/SupremeCourtNominationHearings.htm

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807910302748467612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719882189972
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18079103027484676124047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C