Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 22:49:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0975422A84DD75D2AE600890372A2957105D7A93962C03D4CF974ADB45F25CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Many actions (like assassination or unlawful imprisonment) would be illegal and would not be an "official act" covered by the SCOTUS ruling. POTUS would still be subject to prosecution. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf The ruling today still holds constant the rule of law.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807891015623438456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0975422A84DD75D2AE600890372A2957105D7A93962C03D4CF974ADB45F25CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719874145700
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807891015623438456E0975422A84DD75D2AE600890372A2957105D7A93962C03D4CF974ADB45F25CB