Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 10:55:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

An order to imprison political opponents would be illegal and would not be an "official act" covered by the SCOTUS ruling. POTUS would still be subject to prosecution. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf If obeyed, officials involved would also be court-martialed for knowingly obeying an unlawful order. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/918

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807889331983380685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 64E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7
  • createdAtMillis - 1719917701794
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180788933198338068564E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7