Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 13:50:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934
Participant Details

Original Note:

An order to imprison political opponents would be illegal and would not be an "official act" covered by the SCOTUS ruling. POTUS would still be subject to prosecution. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf If obeyed, officials involved would also be court-martialed for knowingly obeying an unlawful order. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/918

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807889331983380685
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934
  • createdAtMillis - 1719928254836
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078893319833806854B61EF32C51B44CB77185FD341D74F9EE6AE96EEEE263CEF4E2D262AFC753934