Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 03:35:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed notes offer compelling arguments speculating about how this new doctrine would be applied by the courts, but it is still speculation, since no court has considered what might constitute an "official act" under the doctrine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807885056490590313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719891309629
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807885056490590313A391222B720E1D0C11796746750769CCF216C6FC4A2BC4503C49EC11ED4B411B