Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 03:40:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4815DA9CD1B26AE2653033889D0BB8472A9C40BDB0CE2D7B5CAC3EAC5797C881
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed notes offer compelling arguments speculating about how this new doctrine would be applied by the courts, but it is still speculation, since no court has considered what might constitute an "official act" under the doctrine.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807885056490590313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4815DA9CD1B26AE2653033889D0BB8472A9C40BDB0CE2D7B5CAC3EAC5797C881
  • createdAtMillis - 1719891640909
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078850564905903134815DA9CD1B26AE2653033889D0BB8472A9C40BDB0CE2D7B5CAC3EAC5797C881