Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 06:50:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Insinuating “total Presidential immunity” to mean the President can do anything without regard for penalties under the law is explicitly stated in the court’s 7/1 ruling to not be the case. Only “official duties” (prescribed by The Constitution) are covered under immunity. https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-due-rule-trumps-immunity-bid-blockbuster-case-2024-07-01/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807883081929351223
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1719903041838
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807883081929351223CBE0F97E3F2AA9A72BFBB8C296CBD6292C6EE57C36C2616588D86F186A32FAFD