Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:52:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

In a turn of events that should surprise no one the thickest most humourless people on the planet haven’t heard of the “Twitter joke trial” aka Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] EWHC 2157 (Admin) (27 July 2012) https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/2157.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807878940843036827
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1719867135514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180787894084303682747546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7