Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:41:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E38D7C77167643651076B521F94AFB9DDBED9F3136845F5296E75A08FCC28E6C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note omits the fact that the sole arbiters of whether Thomas and Alito are required to recuse under 28 U.S. Code ยง 455 are Thomas and Alito themselves. The statute cited clearly mentions applicable circumstances that would require their recusal. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807873807454978082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E38D7C77167643651076B521F94AFB9DDBED9F3136845F5296E75A08FCC28E6C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719866512765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807873807454978082E38D7C77167643651076B521F94AFB9DDBED9F3136845F5296E75A08FCC28E6C