Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 21:32:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note omits the fact that the sole arbiters of whether Thomas and Alito are required to recuse under 28 U.S. Code ยง 455 are Thomas and Alito themselves. The statute cited clearly mentions applicable circumstances that would require their recusal. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807873807454978082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1719869524385
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078738074549780824A1DE804CAB5D42CB52A5B6E06823268AFEFA24A11AFE74E38360952E1DCDBA0