Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 23:20:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note omits the fact that the sole arbiters of whether Thomas and Alito are required to recuse under 28 U.S. Code ยง 455 are Thomas and Alito themselves. The statute cited clearly mentions applicable circumstances that would require their recusal. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807873807454978082
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
  • createdAtMillis - 1719876053956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807873807454978082003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322