Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-03 00:00:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is factually incorrect and stated for political purposes. The ruling clarifies “official acts” carried under “constitutional duty”. Literally what the Founding Fathers would have intended. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4733839-supreme-court-trump-immunity-case/damp/?nxs-test=damp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807871533198856211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75
  • createdAtMillis - 1719964819209
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180787153319885621119C99014A287B37E0A1CDAFC8A35C1ED6BD276D5502AE2FCEABBA39B4BB9CE75