Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 21:34:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2BA220F474F78B2FF9422461A67CEACAB035B301E2E1F1EB7A3D0DDF4460E2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While a bit simplistic, the 1st statement is vague enough that it doesn't completely mischaracterize the Court's holding. As to the claim that the Clinton campaign was poorly run, which was at least partly responsible for her loss: it's surely at least a reasonable opinion. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-election-president-loss

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807860817594835191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2BA220F474F78B2FF9422461A67CEACAB035B301E2E1F1EB7A3D0DDF4460E2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719869653509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807860817594835191F2BA220F474F78B2FF9422461A67CEACAB035B301E2E1F1EB7A3D0DDF4460E2D