Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 05:10:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA42CC9374597BA94984308938773598320303F333FD9C6E4A89A6071360D94B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Sisson’s comment isn’t a threat. He is simply repeating the argument Trump’s lawyer used when arguing that immunity for official acts includes assassinating a political opponent. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/25/trump-attorney-john-sauer-doubles-down-on-argument-that-presidents-are-immune-from-assassinating-political-rivals-at-supreme-court/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807849878116356266
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA42CC9374597BA94984308938773598320303F333FD9C6E4A89A6071360D94B
  • createdAtMillis - 1719897040389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1807849878116356266DA42CC9374597BA94984308938773598320303F333FD9C6E4A89A6071360D94B