Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 12:21:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Harry Sisson’s comment isn’t a threat. It’s simply repeating the argument Donald Trump’s lawyer used when he argued that immunity for official acts included assassinating a political opponent. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4398223-trump-team-argues-assassination-of-rivals-is-covered-by-presidential-immunity/mlite/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/04/25/trump-attorney-john-sauer-doubles-down-on-argument-that-presidents-are-immune-from-assassinating-political-rivals-at-supreme-court/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807849196885520734
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719922907737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807849196885520734A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D