Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 11:44:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68C7FBE9819439397624AAACF4AADF7D928B81A898328DF8DDDB01F5CF482F40
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: The court ruled the woman's religious exemption was not honored. The court did not rule on thy legality of the vaccine mandate for all employees. https://insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/breaking-news/former-insurance-employee-gets-damages-in-religious-beliefs-vaccine-case-495289.aspx https://law360.com/articles/1852970

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807840716942725126
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68C7FBE9819439397624AAACF4AADF7D928B81A898328DF8DDDB01F5CF482F40
  • createdAtMillis - 1719920679563
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180784071694272512668C7FBE9819439397624AAACF4AADF7D928B81A898328DF8DDDB01F5CF482F40