Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 11:45:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97A362D6B481B2B54EA0F00880606999D3AD75D0F646E699AF10F6EB3CBCF6CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the majority opinion on Trump vs United States the supreme court abstained from defining what constitutes an unofficial act / unofficial conduct. It is premature to suggest that it is knowable if any specific act would be considered (un)official. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807828409520652375
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97A362D6B481B2B54EA0F00880606999D3AD75D0F646E699AF10F6EB3CBCF6CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1719920748265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 180782840952065237597A362D6B481B2B54EA0F00880606999D3AD75D0F646E699AF10F6EB3CBCF6CA