Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 04:48:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A61356C83AFD486515D9CABB4E91241E7BD6BABE29A4384386AE6FCC2B2649D
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the majority opinion on Trump vs United States the supreme court abstained from defining what constitutes an unofficial act / unofficial conduct. It is premature to suggest that it is knowable if any specific act would be considered (un)official. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1807828409520652375
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8A61356C83AFD486515D9CABB4E91241E7BD6BABE29A4384386AE6FCC2B2649D
createdAtMillis - 1719895697359
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18078284095206523758A61356C83AFD486515D9CABB4E91241E7BD6BABE29A4384386AE6FCC2B2649D