Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:25:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP isn't claiming the dissent is law, they are agreeing with Justice Sotomayor's interpretation of the effect of Roberts' majority opinion, which is binding. If you disagree with the Supreme Court Justice's interpretation, use the replies to make your argument. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807821462386127314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1719865524153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807821462386127314E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5