Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 17:05:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C87BF1394146495D4D80785A9836AAB39B89730ADBEDAA81F70A56FD071CF3A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP isn't claiming the dissent is law, they are agreeing with Justice Sotomayor's interpretation of the effect of Roberts' majority opinion, which is binding. If you disagree with the Supreme Court Justice's interpretation, use the replies to make your argument. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807821462386127314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C87BF1394146495D4D80785A9836AAB39B89730ADBEDAA81F70A56FD071CF3A
  • createdAtMillis - 1719853539413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078214623861273147C87BF1394146495D4D80785A9836AAB39B89730ADBEDAA81F70A56FD071CF3A