Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 18:22:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP isn't claiming the dissent is law, they are agreeing with Justice Sotomayor's interpretation of the effect of Roberts' majority opinion, which is binding. If you disagree with the Supreme Court Justice's interpretation, use the replies to make your argument. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807821462386127314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB
  • createdAtMillis - 1719858151742
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078214623861273145E56F6C016DD507935C7568577437D64F63937FADB85FE3FF03FE65C431C2ECB