Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 23:19:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP isn't claiming the dissent is law, they are agreeing with Justice Sotomayor's interpretation of the effect of Roberts' majority opinion, which is binding. If you disagree with the Supreme Court Justice's interpretation, use the replies to make your argument. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807821462386127314
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
  • createdAtMillis - 1719875949378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807821462386127314003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322