Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 16:27:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The OP isn't claiming the dissent is law, they are agreeing with Justice Sotomayor's interpretation of the effect of Roberts' majority opinion, which is binding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/constitutional.aspx https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807820442788585715
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9
  • createdAtMillis - 1719937653426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078204427885857158E9AE402C6994B979C128C5CCB06660F334B91465C8C64EEEFA46D9F524B0ED9