Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 23:12:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The included screenshot is from a dissent, not the ruling. The ruling starts on page 9 of the pdf document and ends on page 51. The referenced quote is from page 97. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf "A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissenting_opinion#:~:text=A%20dissenting%20opinion%20does%20not,should%20be%20limited%20or%20overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807820028030353699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719875528281
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18078200280303536994047F101E57D61BD08CB90112BB437407DE05B38CB1D014F4F7FBC145A008E0C