Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-02 00:57:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
Participant Details

Original Note:

The included screenshot is from a dissent, not the ruling. The ruling starts on page 9 of the pdf document and ends on page 51. The referenced quote is from page 97. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf "A dissenting opinion does not create binding precedent nor does it become a part of case law." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissenting_opinion#:~:text=A%20dissenting%20opinion%20does%20not,should%20be%20limited%20or%20overturned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807820028030353699
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322
  • createdAtMillis - 1719881875370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1807820028030353699003FE7CAE776AF5D828F0B8FA469BC138D3B680F7716D3C602B2EC770DD27322