Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 18:08:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E481C0B6DEFB75C3E68C66EC29F7B26C4C3F9244CB0F4CA960D407DED6F938B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you want to debate the merits of the Supreme Court’s decision, then do so by replying. There is nothing to clarify in the original post, nor is the poster incorrect. Notes are the only thing that even marginally works on this site. Stop trying to break it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807818125049565695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E481C0B6DEFB75C3E68C66EC29F7B26C4C3F9244CB0F4CA960D407DED6F938B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1719857320973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807818125049565695E481C0B6DEFB75C3E68C66EC29F7B26C4C3F9244CB0F4CA960D407DED6F938B1