Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 19:12:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you want to debate the merits of the Supreme Court’s decision, then do so by replying. There is nothing to clarify in the original post, nor is the poster incorrect. Notes are the only thing that even marginally works on this site. Stop trying to break it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807818125049565695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1719861133199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807818125049565695A91D3237944FD0B7339411E670B83C8871654F5BD3CCCFDAF8EA7ED4D2ABFD2D