Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 17:35:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you want to debate the merits of the Supreme Court’s decision, then do so by replying. There is nothing to clarify in the original post, nor is the poster incorrect. Notes are the only thing that even marginally works on this site. Stop trying to break it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807818125049565695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1719855349891
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807818125049565695582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E