Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 17:53:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you want to debate the merits of the Supreme Court’s decision, then do so by replying. There is nothing to clarify in the original post, nor is the poster incorrect. Notes are the only thing that even marginally works on this site. Stop trying to break it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807818125049565695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2
  • createdAtMillis - 1719856393549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078181250495656952C481BF7ADA50465DDA8FDA0AEFCD8575749981BEE0832E8F8D4060A868807B2