Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 23:57:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you want to debate the merits of the Supreme Court’s decision, then do so by replying. There is nothing to clarify in the original post, nor is the poster incorrect. Notes are the only thing that even marginally works on this site. Stop trying to break it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807818125049565695
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1719878245254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807818125049565695061508B1DEAC295B3A9DD1110A67C64E4648295EBCDAAE3B7573723A9F305F2F