Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:06:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not hold that a president has absolute immunity for all official acts. It held that he has absolute immunity for acts within his “preclusive and conclusive constitutional authority” but only “presumptive” immunity for other official acts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807815139414196655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C
  • createdAtMillis - 1719864403307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1807815139414196655E358D5E6C7CD5B5F90B8E2456E9F411E48EB6EAC7338FE33289267680481E20C