Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 18:03:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF26A34E8589F29FB1CB26109AF7BB9F17713ABDC6ED6E3C11E2CD6CEDD65812
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not hold that a president has absolute immunity for all official acts. It held that he has absolute immunity for acts within his “preclusive and conclusive constitutional authority” but only “presumptive” immunity for other official acts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807815139414196655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF26A34E8589F29FB1CB26109AF7BB9F17713ABDC6ED6E3C11E2CD6CEDD65812
  • createdAtMillis - 1719856980477
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807815139414196655BF26A34E8589F29FB1CB26109AF7BB9F17713ABDC6ED6E3C11E2CD6CEDD65812