Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 18:37:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C6F7A4864F005BCB53B2D2981AFC369523C627934BC0AA333688174D1CC7CD4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not hold that a president has absolute immunity for all official acts. It held that he has absolute immunity for acts within his “preclusive and conclusive constitutional authority” but only “presumptive” immunity for other official acts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807815139414196655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C6F7A4864F005BCB53B2D2981AFC369523C627934BC0AA333688174D1CC7CD4
  • createdAtMillis - 1719859069753
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078151394141966557C6F7A4864F005BCB53B2D2981AFC369523C627934BC0AA333688174D1CC7CD4