Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 17:35:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Court did not hold that a president has absolute immunity for all official acts. It held that he has absolute immunity for acts within his “preclusive and conclusive constitutional authority” but only “presumptive” immunity for other official acts. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807815139414196655
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1719855335505
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807815139414196655582160EE1AE1BDCF8F71387CBA0A5983476B71C237AD347B601283446DB99B0E