Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 16:29:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 373A9F1ECF091BCF5E89EB647B6CD6DEAAC474854B01C674DC5D9F53FFA7ABD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a direct quote from the dissent of a Supreme Court justice based on her understanding of the law. There is no need for a community note, even if it expresses the case as the majority justices understand it. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807810692788965814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 373A9F1ECF091BCF5E89EB647B6CD6DEAAC474854B01C674DC5D9F53FFA7ABD2
  • createdAtMillis - 1719851393881
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807810692788965814373A9F1ECF091BCF5E89EB647B6CD6DEAAC474854B01C674DC5D9F53FFA7ABD2