Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 16:56:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D8DBA45050B951C144E3113D704DDC9F481D4A9308E9472007B8EAD90D8B4C1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn’t. The screenshot is from the dissent, not the majority. The majority says that POTUS is only “presumptively” immune for “official acts” unless the criminal prosecution “poses no dangers of intrusion on the authorities and functions of the Executive Branch.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807804508929429647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D8DBA45050B951C144E3113D704DDC9F481D4A9308E9472007B8EAD90D8B4C1A
  • createdAtMillis - 1719852967210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807804508929429647D8DBA45050B951C144E3113D704DDC9F481D4A9308E9472007B8EAD90D8B4C1A