Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 19:23:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn’t. The screenshot is from the dissent, not the majority. The majority says that POTUS is only “presumptively” immune for “official acts” unless the criminal prosecution “poses no dangers of intrusion on the authorities and functions of the Executive Branch.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807804508929429647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1719861834956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807804508929429647B74ACF79861AED6952B9FBA6B518FC91A237BD86C3DFD293E99FC1ADDA9C0DB5