Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:10:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A36BA8EC673A23A85AF84DE3EB4053F8F901E1C37D4FC798CB884F3D712F2F84
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn’t. The screenshot is from the dissent, not the majority. The majority says that POTUS is only “presumptively” immune for “official acts” unless the criminal prosecution “poses no dangers of intrusion on the authorities and functions of the Executive Branch.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807804508929429647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A36BA8EC673A23A85AF84DE3EB4053F8F901E1C37D4FC798CB884F3D712F2F84
  • createdAtMillis - 1719864607910
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807804508929429647A36BA8EC673A23A85AF84DE3EB4053F8F901E1C37D4FC798CB884F3D712F2F84