Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 20:11:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CDB80D3F4ABEB61A7DAFE24CC63066BFC856307E25C2C964BFDB2F64DDA0701
Participant Details

Original Note:

No, they didn’t. The screenshot is from the dissent, not the majority. The majority says that POTUS is only “presumptively” immune for “official acts” unless the criminal prosecution “poses no dangers of intrusion on the authorities and functions of the Executive Branch.” https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807804508929429647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CDB80D3F4ABEB61A7DAFE24CC63066BFC856307E25C2C964BFDB2F64DDA0701
  • createdAtMillis - 1719864703307
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18078045089294296479CDB80D3F4ABEB61A7DAFE24CC63066BFC856307E25C2C964BFDB2F64DDA0701