Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-07-01 19:49:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F31513EAF9C90ECDCB29FDA26A3318FE698B196DAD41077498CDA39E122E6B2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court did not rule on the January 6 case. It remanded to the District Court to assess if a prosecution of alleged attempts to influence the certification proceeding would pose a danger of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch. (p. 6) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807799876693938458
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F31513EAF9C90ECDCB29FDA26A3318FE698B196DAD41077498CDA39E122E6B2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1719863353098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807799876693938458F31513EAF9C90ECDCB29FDA26A3318FE698B196DAD41077498CDA39E122E6B2E