Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 20:56:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB7B950603A84E2CD16134E584FA68C1DFF9EEBE89712EE52D99EDC14D507C20
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - A tweeted claim from Bellingham isn't enough to prove he wasn't doing this at the bench.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807513991910236337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB7B950603A84E2CD16134E584FA68C1DFF9EEBE89712EE52D99EDC14D507C20
  • createdAtMillis - 1719780998961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807513991910236337FB7B950603A84E2CD16134E584FA68C1DFF9EEBE89712EE52D99EDC14D507C20