Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 21:57:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C23BE68253946F5E67EE008DE3A00F0C374124DC4AC0DCB06E7E767B032A201E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - A tweeted claim from Bellingham isn't enough to prove he wasn't doing this at the bench.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807513991910236337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C23BE68253946F5E67EE008DE3A00F0C374124DC4AC0DCB06E7E767B032A201E
  • createdAtMillis - 1719784641913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807513991910236337C23BE68253946F5E67EE008DE3A00F0C374124DC4AC0DCB06E7E767B032A201E