Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 21:41:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 397E4BE48D3F17A4D5A9D4026A7AE3B512A89CAB7A0B9D494F2B9AC8319E91CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - A tweeted claim from Bellingham isn't enough to prove he wasn't doing this at the bench.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807513991910236337
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 397E4BE48D3F17A4D5A9D4026A7AE3B512A89CAB7A0B9D494F2B9AC8319E91CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1719783689020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807513991910236337397E4BE48D3F17A4D5A9D4026A7AE3B512A89CAB7A0B9D494F2B9AC8319E91CC