Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 03:34:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, although accurate, proposed note is better suited for replies. Post is not misleading nor missing context, as it asserts a factually correct claim (citing the poll in the proposed note) and therefore is unsuitable for a CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1807181902593380653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3
  • createdAtMillis - 1719718490252
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1807181902593380653C8468270FD5B1F2819E50FA2F3E8106CF11A4BB406B7FF273A9905A260B2CCA3