Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-29 14:12:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6241C43DF98AD0E1836A939A30CDDCC79D1B123DBB70E327A16A621D0D54166
Participant Details

Original Note:

Incredibly misleading headline. Were Labour to repeal the Act, allowing those who arrived by unregulated routes to apply for asylum - in accordance with international law & treaties - they would, by definition, not be "illegal arrivals". https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/acts/#:~:text=Future%20changes%20to%20the%20law,of%20out%20of%20date%20legislation. https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/information/refugee-asylum-facts/the-truth-about-asylum/#:~:text=The%201951%20Refugee%20Convention%20guarantees,has%20ever%20withdrawn%20from%20it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806935184689782841
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6241C43DF98AD0E1836A939A30CDDCC79D1B123DBB70E327A16A621D0D54166
  • createdAtMillis - 1719670378285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1806935184689782841C6241C43DF98AD0E1836A939A30CDDCC79D1B123DBB70E327A16A621D0D54166