Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-30 01:07:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 51465EC604DA09AED3A53325D18D9A0A4EE36806ED24AB62B1B6257C572B9E7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context: Plaintiffs have brought 12 claims in their amended complaint, the majority of which were dismissed by the court, including claims the mandate violated Nuremberg code https://casetext.com/case/reed-v-tyson-foods-inc-1 This court order does not address the issue of damages, which is still pending. https://www2.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Opinions/Charles%20G.%20Menk%20III%20v.%20The%20MITRE%20Corporation.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1806914309072581086
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 51465EC604DA09AED3A53325D18D9A0A4EE36806ED24AB62B1B6257C572B9E7A
  • createdAtMillis - 1719709638928
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 180691430907258108651465EC604DA09AED3A53325D18D9A0A4EE36806ED24AB62B1B6257C572B9E7A